Essay Analysis
Important Dates

Round 1

09/10/2024

Round 2

01/08/2025

Round 3

04/08/2025

View School Profile

August 31, 2024

Stanford GSB MBA Essay B

Essay B: Why Stanford? (Recommended 350 words)

“Describe your aspirations and how your Stanford GSB experience will help you realize them. If you are applying to both the MBA and MSx programs, use Essay B to address your interest in both programs.”

Same deal as Essay A, going to borrow some key words from Stanford: Your aspirations. Stanford.

  • This is what I want to do—and here is why YOU should be excited about it. (This doesn’t require a ton of backstory or setup—some setup, yes—you need our buy-in. If your idea is uninspired, guess what, so too are “you.” Sell it. Give us just enough background and then in simple terms, walk us through your aspirations. With surgical efficiency.)
  • I can’t get there by myself––skill set, network, etc. such as they are today. I will need a launch pad. An incubator. An environment and set of experiences and interactions that, when coupled with what I need, given who I am and what will bring out the best in me, will give me the *best* boost toward my goals.
  • While many business schools, and especially many of the most elite business business schools will propel me in great and serviceable way, The Stanford GSB presents a unique opportunity to take that boosting effect and turbo charge it. These unique features of Stanford (compared to nearby competitors like HBS, Wharton, and the like) happen to suit me, as I am, and on my ascent to my goals, in a particularly desirable way. Let me walk you through a handful of salient examples of that so you can see for yourself how Stanford, unlike another program, has a unique opportunity to collide with me to propel me toward my goals, but also, how that interaction (Me + Stanford GSB) confers a benefit to Stanford at the same time.

That’s the essay. In a nutshell. That’s what we call “the subtext.” Underneath the actual stuff you write, those are the theme that must be communicated. Efficiently. You have roughly 350 words to make that case.

In order to crush this essay, you must understand Stanford and what they’re all about. This may take some research on your end, and this is what Stanford is hoping—that after a ton of research, you have determined that this place, unlike any other, is a better fit for you than any other program you may get into. Hint hint, including HBS, and Wharton, and CBS, and Sloan, etc. If your case for Why Stanford can be met by another M7 school (or worse, any other business school), dead on arrival.

To begin, you need to establish (1) where you’re headed and (2) what you need in order to get there. You can do this within 100 words, 75 even. Now for your remaining ~250 words, we have work to do. Your task is to make a case for why specific aspects of Stanford’s GSB––offerings, the culture, all of it––collide with you and your particular skills and needs, combine to make the best match of any conceivable match available to you. You + HBS may be good, but not as good as You + Stanford. Why? How exactly? You + Wharton, also great. You’ll be plenty successful with a Wharton degree. But what will be missing? What’s the delta between You + Any Other School and You + Stanford? This is not easy. But the folks who get in are able to nail it.

How to understand Stanford well enough to approach this? Sure, spend time on the website. But, table stakes. Read about the school elsewhere—articles, anything written by current or former students. Also table stakes. Talk to former students. Now we’re getting somewhere. Talk to current students, even more interesting. Visit the campus, more interesting still. Talk to anyone and everyone, do whatever it takes to gain perspectives that aren’t simply available to others. Why? Sure, to showcase that you made that effort. But also, that research is likely to yield insights that strengthen the specificity of your case for Stanford. Not just as an intellectual exercise, but hopefully on an emotional level as well. If, in the course of your research, you’re able to forge a kind of ‘it must be Stanford’ sense, and are able to observe and articulate why that confidence is deepening, in a way that goes far beyond what’s obvious to anyone paying attention that Stanford’s reputation precedes itself… now you’re getting somewhere.

The folks who do this sincerely, are able to execute here because the legwork lends itself to a kind of authenticity and credibility that cannot be faked by someone who hasn’t done the dig-deep research. You can tell. As a reader, you can just tell.

So many ways to engage—where there’s a will, there’s a way. Read stuff by current or former professors. Notice the trends of what kinds of professors came from Stanford. Notice what kinds of companies were started at Stanford. Get a sense. Now, whatever you do, please don’t think that there is a magical phrase or a set of classes you can name drop that will trigger a successful outcome. The demonstration of “fit” here is a wildly organic one. It’s in between the lines, never the lines themselves. Stanford’s assets have to match you in a way that won’t necessarily apply to the guy sitting next to you. This is the whole point about “individuality” and “uniqueness.” Stanford is curious to see how aspects of its program and culture uniquely affect your appetite for an MBA, or for your career goals. It’s not “mentioning a class,” folks. Or “a club.” Or “a professor’s name.” It’s much, much, much more than that.

It’s an argument. An argument that connects Stanford’s assets and offerings *to* you and your skills and capabilities, specifically. It’s not just that Stanford “has” X Y and Z. Stanford knows it has those things. What it doesn’t know is how those things will react with you specifically. Make us picture this, and show us how that collision will play out. You’ll need more than one example to sell it. Minimum two, three is a great target. Here’s your structure:

  • This is what I hope to accomplish (not by way of job title, but define it in terms of the intended effect, and sell us on the virtues of that outcome.(50-75 words)
  • Can’t get there today, here’s what I need, from an MBA program or otherwise. Define it in terms of fundamental ‘ingredients’ that are missing, or in need of development. (50-75 words)
  • Now start explaining one by one, how specific aspects of Stanford create ‘chemical reactions’ with you and your needs. Take us through what will improve, how, why, and what unique aspect of the Stanford offering is worthy of making this list. (Remember, it can’t be something easily found or replicated elsewhere.) (50-75 words)
  • Rinse and repeat (50-75 words, each one)
  • In your final arguments, consider a more emotional argument about how you arrived at this confidence level, in a way that instils in you a feeling that can’t really be studied under a microscope. Why do you feel the GSB is your soulmate, and you theirs? (50-75 words)

Take that approach on your first stab, and that’ll give you a nifty rough draft that we can then take to the thrasher, and start working up to something that’s Adamantium-grade.

Read More

August 30, 2024

Essay A: What matters most to you, and why? (Recommended 650 words)

“For this essay, we would like you to reflect deeply and write from the heart. Once you’ve identified what matters most to you, help us understand why. You might consider, for example, what makes this so important to you? What people, insights, or experiences have shaped your perspectives?”

The ‘set-it-and-forget-it’ champs of b-school essay prompts. Either Stanford has struck gold on the two most perfect admissions questions - ever - to tease out exactly what they’re looking for, or, they canceled essays as a requirement and forgot to update the website. (How awesome would that be?)

This may be one of the hardest of all MBA application essays to write, and to write well. Why? Because it dares you to be authentic and then to risk that rawness - the actual you - being a needle-mover in the admissions decision. Not fun. If they reject you, it’s as if they’re saying “we’ve taken the measure of the real you - thank you for that by the way! - but it’s just not for us.” Here’s the strange Catch-22, and Stanford’s brilliance. The folks who are bold enough to take that risk are more likely aligned with the Stanford ethos, than those who may not naturally lean into this fully, and hold back, and attempt to say the thing they think will impress; in other words . . . hide.

This is easier said than done, and is far more complicated than “take the risk, be authentic, and you’ll be admitted to Stanford GSB!” But it’s a useful starting point. To surrender any fiber of yourself that inclines toward gaming this essay, outsmarting the readers, being too self-conscious of how your essays seems to someone else. These are all counterproductive impulses that we’d like to exorcize from anyone reading this.

Step 1: But what’s the real answer, though?

There’s the “what you might throw down on an application essay to Stanford GSB.” And then there’s the “answer that you know is actually, truly, true.” For most folks, these are two different things. For the folks who tend to get into Stanford GSB, they are far more aligned.

This isn’t an ‘authenticity’ contest, mind you. There’s more to it than that, but it’s an unbelievably important ‘foundation’ on which successful GSB applicants can start to build their answers.

As you begin tackling this question, metaphorically divide your ‘paper’ into two columns. In Column A, write down a what matters to you list that you think is likely to impress Stanford - just this once, allow yourselves to be mindful of what others might think, based on feedback you’ve gotten, your general sense of what may be relevant or of interest to an elite business school. Then in Column B, write down a few things that have nothing to do with business school, but simply answer that question as truly as you know how. What things, if absent, would render everything else meaningless? What things, if present, set the foundation for anything good to follow?

How big a gulf is there between the two sides? What connections might there be? Never start with Column A and try to shoehorn in themes from Column B. Do it the other way. Get in touch with your actual, authentic nerve center. Study your Column B responses. And figure out how those things underlie … everything, including your business aspirations. This is just a starting point. A nice calibration exercise before the real work begins!

Step 2: Consider what others might be writing about. ‘What kind of answer wins the day here?’ And then stop yourself immediately.

If you spend any time worrying about what someone else might be writing about, hoping that that might give you clues about what you should write about, you’re traveling down the wrongest of paths. It has absolutely nothing to with what others are writing about, but how they’re writing about it. Don’t misunderstand us here; this isn’t about writing skill. B-school essays are never about mastery of prose. The “how” here refers to the manner in which the successful candidates are able to introspect, walk around an experience, assess different points of view, offer new points of view, understand themselves keenly such that they will be effective leaders and practitioners of business in the future.

Some key words from Stanford’s description: insights, experiences, people. Written from the heart. Shaped your perspective.

We’ve talked about this Stanford GSB essay a bunch before, so this time around, we want to focus on these concepts above.

Especially that phrase “shaped your perspective.” What has shaped you? Who are you today, and what process has made you that way? If you were describing the Grand Canyon this way, don’t tell us the measurements of how big it is, instead focus on the way water and wind eroded and molded it (or you!). It’s the shaping, the influencing, the molding we want to know about. This is more revealing than “the result.” What was the Grand Canyon like before all the wind and water? That’s your starting point. Then we want to know about the wind and water, and the effect they had. The way those elements changed, developed, ‘reshaped’ what was there prior, into something different. To understand the After, we need to understand the Before. And to build a deeper understanding of the After, it helps to understand the manner in which the ‘Wind’ and ‘Water’ reacted to the specific nature of the ‘Before’ to create what we now know as the ‘After’ (or in this case, the Grand Canyon).

Today, you’re the Grand Canyon. But what were you like before the Wind and the Water? And what does the effect of wind and water tell us about where you might be headed?

Consider the following statement. “I just landed a commercial jet containing 300 passengers.” Impressive? Maybe.

Let’s consider two authors of that statement. Author 1—a 58-year-old veteran pilot with military experience, and 20 years of experience as a professional pilot. Author 1 has flown hundreds of flights every year for the past 20 years. Let’s consider the same statement, but introduce a new author, Author 2. Author 2 is 13 years old, scared of heights, and has a crippling fear of flying. He needs to be sedated every time he flies, in fact. One day, he wakes up mid-flight, due to his sedation unintentionally wearing off. He notices all of the passengers beside him unconscious, the captains of the plane incapacitated, and he turns out to be the only person on board who can communicate with air traffic control. The kid puts on the headset, now fueled by a will to survive that trumps all of his phobias, is guided by folks on the ground, and successfully lands the plane, saving the lives of hundreds on board.

Now ask yourself, which “landing of the commercial jet” feels cooler, and more revealing about the person who performed the feat? The answer is obvious, and the example was purposely absurd to demonstrate a point. The stuff Stanford wants to know about isn’t the “landing of the aircraft.” They wanna know about the phobia. The decision to walk into the cockpit in spite of the phobia. They wanna know how someone with these fears, with zero experience, etc. etc., could pull this thing off. They wanna know about the wind and water folks… that shaped the Grand Canyon. Not the canyon itself.

So, let’s bring this back down to Earth. When you’re figuring out what matters most to you, think about competing influences in your development. The strongest stories are the ones that have the most intense and compelling “arcs” where your starting point is here at point A and then somehow, things, people, circumstances, experiences, etc. shaped you… molded you (like wind and water) to travel to point B where you ended up—essentially—an entirely different person. We need to understand all that context. If you’re talking about an experience that “changed” you, or that “made you who you are,” it’s only as effective as our understanding of who you were before that experience so we can contextualize the change. If a person affected you significantly, same deal—we need to know who you were before that person affected you.

“Before & After” is an incredibly powerful tool for most B-school essays, and never more powerful than here for Stanford’s famous essay.

Grand Canyon, ladies and gentlemen. But not the canyon itself—wind and water. Wind. And water.

Cool. Now let’s talk about a structure that might get you to a strong first draft:

  • For this essay, it may not only be permissible but advisable to start out with the Before picture, without any hint of what that picture eventually becomes. Take us to the You before things developed, or were shaped by external forces. We should have a sense of who this person one, warts and all. Don’t judge it, don’t editorialize, just convey as faithfully as you can. (150 words)
  • Now, introduce some of the shaping elements that you would realize (later on) would have a shaping effect on this before picture. But don’t get ahead of yourself and explain the change. It’s too early for that. Tell it to us as though it were happening, but without hindsight perspective. What or who began to make it so that the ‘old’ you could no longer hold, and was evolving, denaturing, developing, shifting, transfiguring, into something else? (150-200 words)
  • Now, start to editorialize, and put on your ‘today, looking back’ brain, and make sense of it all. Explain what you think happened. Explain the delta between that Before picture and the After picture. And make sure to revolve it around something significant, making it noteworthy for you to write about, here. (200-250 words)
  • Finally, it’s time to get into captioning all of that into a kind of elegant redux that helps us understand what matters most to you and why. Using the words you’ve spent thus far, explain it now in terms of why this is somehow central to you in a way that touches how you behave, how you interpret, how you interact with others, how you process things, how you feel, how you ‘do.’ Touch on what this might mean for what happens next for you. Imagine a version of the future where your change elements didn’t exist, and that ‘Before’ version of you took on the world, and compare it to the current version of you, the evolved, developed, shaped version, that benefits from the lessons of the ‘what matters’ insight, and grapple with this future picture. We should be able to see, and you should be able to articulate, why the second picture is much more compelling. (100 words)
View more essay analyses.

Need help with your
essay writing?

We got you.

View Our Services