Smart MBA solutions for every need, every budget.

We design our services to be structured, but flexible, comprehensive, but efficient. And effective, always.

5909290F-42CF-4999-A6DB-6A01A55C0208

Pricing Table

Application Services
Pricing Table
Silver Gold Platinum
Base Pricing
1 Application 3,640 6,450 9,920
2 Applications 5,040 8,250 11,720
3 Applications 6,440 9,900 13,370
4 Applications 7,740 11,400 14,870
5 Applications 8,940 12,750 16,220
6 Applications 9,940 13,950 17,420
7 Applications 10,940 15,150 18,620
Each Additional
1,600 1,900 1,900

Comparison Table

Application Services
Services Table
Silver Gold Platinum
Discovery & Competitive Edge Positioning
Clients fill out a detailed (and lengthy) questionnaire which includes our popular IMPACT™ rubric. IMPACT™ stands for the six crucial dimensions of the ideal MBA applicant that demand careful attention: Influence, Management, Passion, Awareness, Creativity, Teamwork. We want to know not only the obvious stuff, but most essentially the less-obvious stuff: Can you inspire others? Can you plan? Do you have fire in your belly? Do you have humility? Can you think outside the box? Can you see other perspective? This helps us focus our strategy as we start to move toward developing a clear branding and differentiation strategy. Our popular IMPACT™ methodology is seamlessly integrated into this kickoff effort.
We then study the responses carefully, along with the IMPACT™ framework as a guiding doc, to begin developing an initial strategy for where to spend time, and how to spend that time most effectively. This is Part I of the most pivotal phase of the opening diagnostic and synthesis effort.
The planning session is the crucial second half of the Competitive Edge Positioning process. Over a deep dive phone call, we chat with the Client to a develop a deep understanding to help us develop a clear plan moving forward: we should be able to determine the Client’s ideal application angle after asking the right questions and having an open and honest exploratory dialogue.
The concluding step of this initial (and most vital) stage of the process is for us to synthesize our thoughts into an actionable document (The Action Plan). This document will articulate at a high-level how we will cohere all the pieces into a clear and persuasive application branding strategy.
Sometimes, a fresh take from a highly scrutinizing “person in the know” can be incredibly useful when establishing the where and how of pointing the rudder. We have developed a unique methodology that involves the Client answering a handful of standard questions on video (the same questions go to all Clients who undergo this process). We then select an experienced M7 alum (sometimes someone with like-kind industry experience as well, the “Auditor”) to react to the video along with the material from the Discovery process and score the Client the way an admissions committee member might. This assessment is then passed along to the main consultant who then discusses the case with the Auditor to review potential angles to consider as the main consultant moves toward putting the finishing touches on the Action Plan.
Exhaustive Iterative Drafting Process
“Measure twice, cut once.” Before we sign off on an essay to enter our exhaustive iterative drafting process (a process which involves our essay analysis specialists), we first assess the readiness of the Client’s proposed essay themes. We get every Client’s proposed essays to the same state of readiness before we pass it to the next phase. Typically, this happens with reviewing an outline or a high-level “logic map” ahead of time to get the contours and underlying themes rock solid before attempting to strengthen the effectiveness of that message.
Next to the strategic work we perform at the beginning of each service, the Essay Analysis / Iterative Drafting phase is the most transformative work we do together. Over the course of four rounds of analysis and feedback, we help Clients transform raw essays into crisp, persuasive, and authentic works ready for submission. This process requires mastery along two key dimensions: (1) Diagnosis – astutely ascertaining which aspects of the student’s essay are strong/weak, logical/illogical, viscerally moving/flat, etc., and (2) Actionable Feedback – making effective suggestions that inspire students to rewrite and rephrase their work in a manner that both improves their effectiveness, but also (crucially) preserves their authentic voice. Failure along either dimension can be critically damaging to the process. The experience and skill level of our Consultants and Essay Specialists here is peerless.
For the first three schools of a multi-school campaign, we involve a Blind Reviewer from the team to provide an objective assessment of the Client’s main essays. We have developed a tactical conceit for the Blind Reviewer to approach these essays under the hypothetical conceit that the Client’s application has been rejected: the job of the Blind Reviewer is to explain why. This methodology provides the sharpest insights with actionable (and constructive) feedback to the Primary Consultant to illuminate opportunities for potential improvement early in the process.
Another innovative creation from the Admissionado Labs! Once the Client has gone through the full Discovery process and has generated a first draft of all main essays for the first school, we cohere these elements into a simulated “final” application for a hand-selected committee of three tough critics (Former M7 Adcom) to review. Included in this “final application” is the video recording of the three questions we use in The M7 Insider AuditTM. Our committee of three reviews the candidate alongside a handful of other candidates (prior admits as well as waitlists as well as rejections), to facilitate a comparative analysis, i.e., a simulation of how the decision-making process works in reality. First, the scores are committed independently; this is followed by a dialogue to consider the candidate in a frank and qualitative manner. The highlights of this conversation are then passed to the main consultant at this critical juncture in the application process – leaving enough time to make any important adjustments to align the application toward the most optimal outcome. In order to make the dialogue as honest and constructive as possible for the Client’s benefit, we do not disclose the results of the internal dialogue.
Peripheral Components Checklist
This document needs to look one way for job hunting. It needs to be something entirely different for a business school application. This doc tells a vital part of your story, but needs to tell it in a very specific way, to achieve a very specific thing. We ink it up with actionable feedback over two rounds. If done correctly, this document should provide a roadmap for things you will want to convey in the rest of your application: aka “the things in between the lines of your Resume bullets.”
We can provide guidance on choosing recommenders, as well as strategies for approaching and soliciting recommendations themselves. In instances where recommenders are open to feedback, we provide high-level guidance to Clients and/or directly to the recommenders. The preferences of the recommenders are critical, and we will only provide feedback given appropriate consent. Letters of Recommendation Support includes up to two rounds of light-touch feedback for two recommenders.
We help prepare Clients over the course of two meetings. We begin cold–on purpose–with a Mini-Mock Interview, followed by tailored preparation tactics, key considerations, and a review of commonly asked questions. In our experience, the strongest lessons are forged with this “cold call”-inspired step. We then follow up with a second meeting where we conduct a formal Mock Interview followed by targeted feedback. In addition, we provide access to an amazing online tool Clients can use (without limit) to practice answering questions from a bank of prompts we have generated based on years of experience and input from past Clients and former M7 admissions committee members.
In addition to the process included in Standard Interview Prep, we include one additional Blind Interview from a second expert on the team who does not have access to any prior history or details of the client. We do this to simulate a truly unbiased interview. In this scenario, our Blind Interviewer can offer objective feedback (internally) on the Client’s performance and profile strength. We begin the Premium Interview Prep process with this Blind Interview, and then use the feedback from this session to provide a roadmap for improvement for the subsequent Mock Interview process with the Client’s primary consultant. (Same as with Standard Interview Prep, clients have access to our online tool they use for unlimited practice.)
After decisions are rendered, we provide one additional strategy session if Clients require assistance on choosing from multiple admits (we hope and expect this to be the case!).
In instances where additional support is required for Waitlists, we provide guidance on next steps and when appropriate “Letters of Continued Interest” (or the equivalent), with up to two rounds of targeted feedback per item, based on our recommended list of materials to submit.
Service Support Detail
We are available via email from the start of the engagement through to the end.
Our objective is to provide oracle-level guidance. If that requires phone calls, we’ve got you. We can help manage expectations regarding how much phone access to expect for each tier.

Advanced Planning Pricing

Early-Stage MBA Applicants
Mentorship Table
Silver Gold Platinum
Base Pricing
Mentorship Services 2185 3010 4640

Advanced Planning Comparison

Early-Stage MBA Applicants
Mentorship Table
Silver Gold Platinum
Discovery & Competitive Edge Positioning
Clients fill out a detailed (and lengthy) questionnaire. We look at everything: professional, personal, everything. We’re looking for opportunities under a fine-toothed comb.
We review your responses ahead of our strategy call, to make sure our time together is as high yield as possible.
This call gives us crucial information about you: goals, strengths and weaknesses, your current work situation. We consider it all carefully to develop a battle plan to help you build as much ‘future application muscle strength’ as possible.
We now have a sense of the baseline, along with a sense of how to measure success along the targets we establish.
Mentorship Support / Hours
In addition to time spent on Discovery and Strategy, each tier includes a bucket of hours of support, depending on your needs. Some (or all) of these can be used on high-level strategy phone calls (for MBA applicants this is most common, and highest-yield).
Total Additional Hours 3 6 12

CounterCheck™ Background Verification

Our CounterCheck™ verification support service helps you navigate the confusing, and often intimidating, process of providing any required documentation and winning approval from verification agencies

30 Minute Consult

$295 Learn More

Basic Service

$545 Learn More

Expanded Service

$875 Learn More

Comprehensive Service

$2,195 Learn More

A La Carte Services & Add-Ons

Purchase what you need, at your own pace, and on your own terms. We have a deep bench of A La Carte options for you to choose from.

Discovery & Competitive Edge Positioning

$980

The M7 Insider Audit™

$610

Blind 2nd Consultant Peer Review

$610

Resume Development

$790

Letters of Recommendation Support

$870

Interview Prep Standard

$790

Interview Prep Premium

$1,190

Waitlist Support

$790

Gut Check / Ding Analysis

$790

HBS and Post-Reflection Interview

$660

Team-Based Decision Interview Prep

$570

GMAT/GRE Hourly Tutoring

$250

Consulting Career Advisory (CCA) Support

Learn More

Hourly Support

Learn More

FAQs

Questions about our MBA packages and pricing.

We offer two core types of service, based entirely on where you are in your timeline — not on upsells, pressure, or artificial bundles.

First: Application Consulting.
This is for candidates actively applying in an upcoming round. These packages cover the full arc of the work that actually matters: early strategy and positioning, competitive edge development, essays, and execution through submission. We offer three tiers — Silver, Gold, and Platinum — and pricing scales by the number of schools you’re applying to.

One application means one school’s complete essay set. Three schools means three applications. Six means six. No fuzzy math, no “unlimited*” footnotes, no games.

Comprehensive application packages typically land between roughly $3,600 and $19,000, depending on tier and number of schools. À la carte and hourly services generally fall between $250 and $1,200 per component.

Second: Advanced Planning.
This is for candidates who are a year or more out and want to play the long game intelligently, before application season turns into a panic spiral. Advanced Planning runs as a one-year engagement and comes in three levels — Silver, Gold, and Platinum — differentiated solely by the amount of consulting time included (3, 6, or 12 hours). Every engagement starts with the same discovery and strategy foundation; the difference is how much ongoing guidance you want as you execute over time. Pricing typically ranges from about $2,200 to $4,600.

Where do we sit on price? Exactly where we mean to. Low enough to stay grounded in reality. High enough to work only with consultants who are genuinely excellent at this. Any cheaper and quality collapses. Any higher and you’re paying for vibes, not judgment.

In general, no. Our pricing reflects how the work is staffed and delivered, and we don’t routinely split payments or restructure packages as a default.

That said, if there’s a genuine timing or logistical constraint, we’re open to a straightforward conversation about whether there’s a clean way to make things work. No promises, no snake oil — come talk to us.

These are fundamentally different products, built for different situations.

A comprehensive package covers the full arc of an MBA application: Discovery and Competitive Edge Positioning (including our IMPACT™ diagnostic and kickoff strategy call), a clear Action Plan, and the full Exhaustive Iterative Drafting Process for every school you’re applying to. You work with a lead consultant who owns strategy and positioning, plus a dedicated essay specialist who works at the sentence level. That dual-role model isn’t an upgrade — it’s the baseline.

The difference between tiers is scope, not quality. Silver covers the core work: strategy and essays. Gold adds what most candidates actually want and use — resume development, letters of recommendation support, interview prep, post-admit and waitlist strategy — and is the sweet spot for most applicants. Platinum adds our most intensive tools and extra perspectives, like the Admissions Committee Simulator, blind second-consultant review, premium interview prep, and additional consulting time. None are required to get strong results, but for complex or high-stakes profiles, they can add real value.

Hourly and à la carte work is different. It’s best for candidates who already have a coherent strategy and need a targeted second opinion — pressure-testing an essay, sharpening interview prep, or sanity-checking positioning. What it’s not designed to do is replace full-cycle consulting. Diagnosing the whole picture and quarterbacking a multi-school campaign takes sustained work, not a one-off session.

That’s what the consultation call is for. We’ll tell you plainly which model fits your situation — and if hourly is the right answer, we’ll say so before you spend money on the wrong thing.

It depends on who you’re comparing us to — and what you think you’re actually paying for.

Some firms charge dramatically more. Are you getting more? Sometimes you’re getting brand legacy, layers of overhead, or the psychological comfort of an ultra-premium price tag. Many of the most expensive shops quietly self-select “shoe-ins,” turn away riskier profiles, then market pristine success rates built on that filtering. If that model appeals to you, great — it’s a rational choice.

We take a different approach. Our clients range from hyper-competitive MBB candidates swinging only at HBS and GSB to unconventional profiles others won’t touch. We don’t screen for safety, and we don’t price based on optics. We price based on the actual work required to do this well.

MBA admissions consulting is labor-intensive, and genuinely excellent consultants command real market value. Below a certain price point, either the talent isn’t there or the attention isn’t. Above a certain point, the value starts drifting into “expensive because expensive.”

We sit where the value is real. Our consultants clear a hiring bar that eliminates roughly 95% of applicants, based on blind evaluation of work product, not résumé pedigree. Every engagement pairs a lead strategist with a dedicated essay specialist — standard, not upsold. The pricing reflects that caliber of thinking, that depth of process, and that level of sustained attention.

If you’re optimizing for the most expensive option, we’re probably not your firm. If you’re optimizing for sharp judgment and serious work, put us up against anyone. We’re comfortable there.

No. And the question itself tells you something useful about this industry.

Our packages are priced to cover the full scope of work most candidates actually need. We do that deliberately, because nickel-and-diming distorts incentives. Your consultant should be focused on what strengthens your application — not on whether a suggestion triggers an upsell.

There are two exceptions worth flagging. The first is rush work. When timelines compress at the last minute, maintaining the same quality requires outsized effort and reallocation of consultant capacity. We can provide rush support when needed, but it comes at an additional cost — not as a penalty, but because it genuinely takes more to execute well under pressure. Our goal is always to help you avoid this scenario through early planning, not to profit from it.

The second is highly specialized situations that fall outside the norm — things like team-based decision interview prep, GMAT/GRE tutoring, or CounterCheck™ background verification support. It wouldn’t be fair to bake those costs into standard pricing for everyone, so they’re handled separately with clear, published rates.

The principle is simple: most clients never see an extra charge. When something genuinely falls outside the expected scope, we talk about it clearly and in advance. You’ll never be surprised by an invoice you didn’t understand or agree to.

Yes — and it’s more common than you might expect.

Many candidates start with a clear sense of scope and then discover, often after the kickoff strategy call, that the competitive landscape is more complex than they assumed, that additional schools belong on the list, or that they want deeper support in areas they initially planned to handle themselves. That’s normal. The strategy process is meant to sharpen your thinking, and sharper thinking sometimes changes the plan.

Upgrading is straightforward. You can move from Silver to Gold or Gold to Platinum mid-engagement. You can add schools to your application count. You can layer in à la carte services — interview prep, resume work, the M7 Insider Audit™, blind peer review — at any point they’d genuinely add value. Pricing adjusts proportionally; you’re not penalized for starting lean.

What we don’t do is push bigger packages upfront. If Silver is the right fit when you begin, we’ll say so. If the work later suggests Gold or Platinum would serve you better, we’ll explain why — and let you decide. The door stays open; the upsell stays off.

We offer an initial grace period at the start of every engagement. During that window, you can adjust your service level — add scope, reduce scope, or cancel — for any reason. We build this in so you can commit with clarity, not pressure. If something doesn’t feel right once the process begins, it’s better to correct course early than to force a bad fit to continue.

After the grace period ends, we don’t offer refunds. At that point, your consultant and essay specialist have committed real, finite capacity to your work. We’re a boutique firm by design, and we don’t overbook — when we say yes to a client, it means saying no to someone else. That’s how we protect quality, and it’s why the policy needs to be firm once the engagement is underway.

Rescheduling within an engagement is a different matter. If a round deadline shifts, if your timeline changes, or if life intervenes in ways that require adjusting the cadence, we work with you. Rigidity for its own sake helps no one. What we won’t do is leave an engagement indefinitely open-ended — there are practical limits to how long consultant capacity can be held, and we’ll be transparent about what’s feasible.

Read the policy, ask questions, make sure the fit is right before you sign. That’s exactly what the consultation call is for. Once we start, we’re all in — make sure you are too.

Advanced Planning hours are valid for one calendar year from the date of purchase. That’s the shelf life, and it’s intentional — open-ended engagements with no expiration tend to lose focus, and unfocused work helps no one.

Within that year, usage is flexible. You and your consultant decide how to allocate the hours: how many calls, how long, what cadence. Some candidates front-load the strategic work. Others spread it evenly. The structure adapts to your situation.

For application packages, the engagement is inherently round-driven. Your package covers the schools and rounds you’re applying to. If you need to add a round or extend into a subsequent cycle, that’s a conversation — not an automatic rollover, but not a brick wall either. We’ll work with you on what makes sense.

The underlying principle is the same across all service types: the hours you pay for are real consulting time with real people. They aren’t tokens in a vending machine. Use them with intention, and they’ll produce results.

Usually, yes — with some practical constraints worth understanding.

If you’re mid-engagement and realize that R1 isn’t realistic, shifting focus to R2 is a conversation we’re happy to have. It happens. Timelines slip, GMAT retakes push things back, work gets unexpectedly intense. We’d rather recalibrate around a realistic deadline than rush you into a weaker submission just to hit an arbitrary target.

What we can’t guarantee is that the exact same consultant capacity will be available in a later round. Our strongest consultants fill their rosters ahead of each cycle. If you shift from R1 to R2 early enough, continuity is almost always preserved. If the shift happens late, we may need to adjust — and we’ll be upfront about what that looks like.

The strategic work doesn’t expire. Your IMPACT™ analysis, your Action Plan, your competitive positioning — all of that carries forward regardless of which round you submit in. What changes is pacing and logistics, not the quality of the foundation.

One honest note: pushing to a later round is sometimes the right call, but it shouldn’t become a habit. Deadlines create productive pressure. Candidates who keep deferring often aren’t struggling with timing — they’re struggling with commitment. If we sense that pattern, we’ll name it directly. That’s not judgment. It’s us doing our job.

Honestly? Not always.

If your profile is straightforward — strong GMAT, clean career progression, a clear story, and a manageable school list — you may not need comprehensive consulting at all. A focused hourly session to pressure-test your essays or positioning could be plenty, and we’d rather you save the money than buy firepower you don’t need.

Where consulting starts to earn its keep is when you’re competing in a tough demo and the margin for error is thin. You might think you know what makes you competitive — and often you’re half right — but we’re working with your competitors every day. We see how similar profiles present themselves, where applications blur together, and which “unique” angles are actually boilerplate in disguise. One of the biggest risks at the top end isn’t weakness; it’s sounding indistinguishable from the rest of the pack.

That matters most in situations like these: you’re applying to M7 programs where acceptance rates live in the single digits; you’re a reapplicant trying to diagnose what didn’t land; you’re non-traditional and don’t fit a clean mold; or you’re juggling a demanding job, multiple schools, and timelines that don’t care how busy you are. In those cases, the cost of getting it wrong — a wasted cycle, lost momentum, or landing a tier below where you could have — often dwarfs the cost of getting it right.

The real question isn’t whether MBA consulting is “worth it” in the abstract. It’s whether the gap between doing this yourself and doing it with expert, market-aware guidance is large enough for you. For some candidates, that gap is small. For others, it’s the difference between a ding and an admit.

The consultation call is free. Use it to find out which one you are.