Smart college solutions for every need, every budget.

We design our services to be structured, but flexible, comprehensive, but efficient. And effective, always.

5909290F-42CF-4999-A6DB-6A01A55C0208

College Mentorship Service Pricing

Early Stage Guidance For Younger students (Grades 9-11)
Mentorship Table
Silver Gold Platinum
Mentorship Pricing 2,050 3,320 5,370

College Mentorship Service Comparison

Mentorship Table
Silver Gold Platinum
Discovery & Competitive Edge Positioning
Parents and Students are invited to fill out a detailed (and lengthy) questionnaire. We look at everything: academic, non-academic, personal circumstances.
We review the responses ahead of the strategy call, to utilize as much of the call on ‘advanced’ topics, yielding as substantive a discussion as possible.
This call gives us crucial information about the student: temperament and working style, goals, strengths and weaknesses. We consider it all as we develop a battle plan for next steps.
We now have a sense of the baseline, along with a sense of how to measure success along the targets we establish. This is where we put the theory into something that’s concrete, and gives us a crucial (and focusing) starting point.
Alignment is extremely helpful. We invite any parents who would like to review the proposed gameplan into a discussion before we lead the charge the rest of the way.
Mentorship Support / Hours
Each tier of service includes a bucket of hours that are formal ‘consultation’ hours. Some clients utilize all of these hours on meetings. Others split this between meeting time, and other support that might include offline support from your consultant.
Consultation Hours (Beyond Initial Strategy) 5 10 20

Pricing Table

Application Services
Pricing Table
Silver Gold Platinum*
Base Pricing (Application Clients – Grade 12)
1 School (Common App/UCAS + Supplementals) 4,440 6,860 10,940*
2 Schools (Additional Supplementals) 5,670 8,450 12,530*
3 Schools (Additional Supplementals) 6,820 9,920 14,000*
4 Schools (Additional Supplementals) 7,830 11,070 15,140*
5 Schools (Additional Supplementals) 8,790 12,150 16,230*
6 Schools (Additional Supplementals) 9,670 13,150 17,220*
7 Schools (Additional Supplementals) 10,560 14,140 18,220*
8 Schools (Additional Supplementals) 11,420 15,110 19,190*
9 Schools (Additional Supplementals) 12,280 16,080 20,150*
10 Schools (Additional Supplementals) 13,090 16,980 21,050*
Add-As-You-Go (Each Additional Application) 1,400 1,700 1,700*

* Please Note: The last date to purchase Platinum Service for this cycle is October 31

Comparison Table

Application Services
Services Table
Silver Gold Platinum
Discovery & Competitive Edge Positioning
Students fill out a detailed (and lengthy) questionnaire. We want to know about motivations, passions, hobbies, personal stories, strengths, weaknesses, and much more. This helps us focus our strategy as we start to move toward developing a clear differentiation strategy. Our popular SPARC™ methodology is seamlessly integrated into this kickoff effort.
We then study the responses carefully, along with the SPARC™ results, to begin developing an initial strategy for where to spend time, and how to spend that time most effectively. This is Part I of the most pivotal phase of opening diagnostics and synthesis effort.
The strategy and planning meeting is the crucial second half of the Competitive Edge Positioning process. Over a deep dive phone call, we chat with the student to develop a clear plan: we should be able to determine the student’s ideal application angle after asking the right questions and having an open and honest dialogue.
Using our Echelon Mapping Methodology, combining a proprietary formula with decades of raw experience, we synthesize information about the student to help determine an approach to school selection that includes recommendations for Safety, Match, and Reach programs. This list is meant to ensure an admit, while opening the skies to reaching as high as possible. This balance is not easy, but is fundamental to our ethos. Next we synthesize the overall ‘throughline’ strategy (Branding), to serve as a focusing object to develop an application that is (1) coherent and (2) maximally competitive. Finally, we establish a timeline to help frame the overall effort, with big milestone goals, along with smaller ones. This gives us an essential starting point, which we will update as we make progress.
With Standard Benchmarking, we provide the ‘cipher’ for you to focus your specific school selection efforts, enabling you to make the most appropriate choices based on criteria that is important to you (location, cost, etc.). With the Detailed Target School List Report, we take it one step further and make specific school recommendations for each tier (Safety, Match, Reach).
“Measure twice, cut once.” Before we sign off on an essay to enter our exhaustive iterative drafting process (a process which involves our essay analysis specialists), we first assess the readiness of the student’s proposed essay, wherever the student is in the process. Some students know exactly what they wish to write about, others are considering a few options, others benefit from a sounding board for ideas, while others are simply stuck. Regardless of the circumstance, we consider not just the Essay Topic, but also the Essay Modality (think ‘genre’). The winning combination must be perfectly aligned with what will bring out the best in each individual applicant.
The Essay Development Cauldron
Next to the strategic work we perform at the beginning of each service, the Essay Analysis / Iterative Drafting phase is the most transformative work we do together. Over the course of four-to-five rounds of analysis and feedback, we help students transform raw essays into crisp, persuasive, and authentic works ready for submission. This process requires mastery along two key dimensions: (1) Diagnosis – astutely ascertaining which aspects of the student’s essay are strong/weak, logical/illogical, viscerally moving/flat, etc., and (2) Actionable Feedback – making effective suggestions that inspire students to rewrite and rephrase their work in a manner that both improves their effectiveness, but also (crucially) preserves their authentic voice. Failure along either dimension can be critically damaging to the process. The experience and skill level of our Consultants and Essay Specialists here is peerless.
An innovative creation from the Admissionado Labs! Utilizing all the input from the student thus far into the process, we also present the student with one additional task: answer three carefully curated questions in video form. We do this for a few reasons: (1) It allows the student to convey their personality more directly than through the written word; (2) It provides an opportunity for students to explore ideas and topics that might become relevant in the essay writing phase; (3) Forcing the student to convey complex thoughts into a compressed time frame is excellent training for effective communication. Our committee of three reviews the candidate alongside a handful of other candidates (prior admits as well as waitlists as well as rejections), to facilitate a blind, comparative analysis, i.e., a simulation of how the decision-making process works in reality. Three scores are committed first, followed by a dialogue to consider the candidate in a frank and qualitative manner. The highlights of this conversation are then passed back to the main consultant. In order to make the dialogue as honest and constructive as possible, we do not disclose the results of the internal dialogue.
For the 2nd and 3rd schools of a multi-school campaign at the Platinum Level (a follow-up to the Adcom Sim on School #1), we involve a Blind Reviewer from the team to provide an objective assessment of the student’s main essays, along with all other materials collected to-date. We have developed a tactical conceit for the Auditor to approach these essays under the hypothetical premise that the student’s application has been rejected: the job of the Auditor is to explain why. This methodology provides the sharpest insights with actionable feedback to the Primary Consultant to illuminate opportunities for potential improvement with ample time still remaining in the process.
Peripheral Components Checklist
We can provide guidance on choosing recommenders, as well as strategies for approaching and soliciting recommendations themselves. In instances where recommenders are open to feedback, we provide high-level guidance to students and/or directly to the recommenders. The preferences of the recommenders are critical, and we will only provide feedback given appropriate consent. Letters of Recommendation Support includes up to two rounds of light-touch feedback.
When interviews are offered by target schools, we help prepare students over the course of two meetings. We begin cold (on purpose) with a Mini-Mock Interview, followed by tailored preparation tactics, key considerations, and a review of commonly asked questions. In our experience, the strongest lessons are forged with this “cold call”-inspired step. We then follow up with a second meeting where we conduct a formal Mock Interview followed by targeted feedback.
In addition to the process included in Standard Interview Prep, we include one additional Blind Interview from a second expert on the team who does not have access to any prior history or details of the client. We do this to simulate a truly unbiased interview. In this scenario, our Blind Interviewer can offer objective feedback (internally) on the student’s performance and profile strength. We begin the process with this Blind Interview, and then use the feedback from this session to provide a roadmap for improvement for the subsequent Mock Interview process with the student’s primary consultant.
Because these specialized interviews are invite-only, and limited to those applying to Oxbridge specifically, this service is sold separately.
We provide high-level guidance on the Activities List. We make recommendations on inclusions, exclusions, and wording choices when appropriate. This includes two light-touch rounds of feedback.
Typically, consultants will review the main application form (over a shared screen, never controlling the application itself for obvious ethical reasons) and support in areas where we can reasonably add value. This takes place over one phone call, or via email if students are more comfortable collating specific questions in written form.
After decisions are rendered, we provide one additional strategy session if students or parents require assistance on deferrals, or if choosing from multiple admits (we hope this is the case!).
In instances where additional support is required for Waitlists, we provide guidance on next steps and when appropriate “Letters of Continued Interest” (or the equivalent), with up to two rounds of targeted feedback.
Service Support Detail
We are available via email from the start of the engagement through to the end.
Our objective is to provide oracle-level guidance. If that requires phone calls, we’ve got you. While technically not unlimited (some will abuse this), we still want it to feel as though you always have access when needed and warranted. We can help manage expectations regarding how much phone access to expect for each tier, and we invite you to discuss this with us ahead of time! We say it often: alignment is crucial, and we want our approach to exceed your expectations. Let’s get on the same page!
For students who might benefit from additional time with their consultant (usually in the area of help with project management, staying on task, regular check-ins, etc..) we provide the option of adding blocks of hours (three hours per block). The Platinum package includes six hours as a starting point. Otherwise, you can add as many 3-hour blocks as needed. We can assist in helping you choose the right number of hours needed based on your timing, as well as your individual preferences.

A La Carte Services & Add-Ons

Purchase what you need, at your own pace, and on your own terms. We have a deep bench of A La Carte options for you to choose from.

Detailed Target School List Report

$330

The Admissions Committee Simulator

Learn More

The Ivy League Insider Audit™ (per application)

$390

Letter of Recommendation Support

$780

Interview Prep Standard (2 Sessions)

$650

Interview Prep Premium (2 Sessions, plus Blind Mock Interview)

$980

Oxbridge Interview Prep Premium (2 Sessions)

$865

Activities List Review

$330

Wailtist Support

$460

Additional Consultation Hourly Blocks (3 hours)

$920

SAT / ACT Tutoring (Hourly)

$250

FAQs

It depends on the scope of support, which is why we don’t use a single flat rate. Our comprehensive college admissions packages typically range from $5,000 to $20,000, and limited hourly or à la carte services generally fall between $300 and $1,000. We publish this openly because pricing opacity in this industry is unnecessary — and at its worst, predatory. When firms hide pricing, they’re often trying to anchor you emotionally before you’ve had a chance to compare rationally.

Our pricing sits where we believe the value is real. Much lower, and we couldn’t attract or retain the caliber of consultants this work actually requires. Much higher, and the value starts drifting into status pricing — arguably defensible, but unnecessary. We price our services to reflect experienced judgment, sustained involvement, and real accountability, without turning admissions consulting into a luxury good for its own sake.

We offer two core types of service, based on where a student is in the process.

The first is application consulting, designed for students in the second half of junior year through senior year who are actively applying. These packages focus on strategy, storytelling, and execution during application season. They come in three tiers — Silver, Gold, and Platinum — and are further scaled by the number of applications a student is submitting. An application is defined simply: one Common App plus that school’s required supplemental essays. Apply to one school, that’s one application; apply to five schools, that’s five. Clean, transparent, no games.

The second is mentorship consulting, designed for students in grades 9–11 who want structured, ongoing guidance before application season begins. Mentorship is offered in one-year engagements at three levels — Silver, Gold, and Platinum — based on how many consulting hours a student needs over the year. All mentorship engagements begin with the same strategic discovery process, then shift into a bank of hours. We’ve studied the patterns closely, and most students’ needs fall cleanly into one of these three levels. The flexibility is intentional: families can dial support up or down year-to-year as needs change, rather than being locked into a rigid multi-year contract.

Across all packages, our model is the same. Every student works with a lead consultant and a dedicated essay specialist. That’s not an add-on — it’s the baseline. The difference between tiers is scope, not quality: how early we start, how many applications we support, and how deep the strategic work goes beyond essays. We deliberately avoid nickel-and-diming because it distorts incentives. Your consultant should be focused on what strengthens your application, not on whether a recommendation triggers an upsell.

At a high level, the difference between tiers is scope, not quality. We don’t tier consultants by experience or credentials — every student gets the same caliber of lead consultant and the same dedicated essay specialist. The engine is the same in every tier. What changes is how much road you want, and how many features matter to you.

For mentorship services, tiers are determined by the number of consulting hours included over a one-year engagement. All mentorship students go through the same initial strategic discovery process; the difference is how much ongoing guidance you want during the year. Some families need a lighter touch to stay on track. Others want more frequent check-ins, deeper iteration, or help navigating complex academic or extracurricular decisions. We’ve designed the tiers around those natural usage patterns.

For application services, the tiers are modular.

Silver covers the core: application strategy and essay work. It’s designed for students who are already strong and focused, or who are coming to the process later and need efficient, high-impact support.

Gold includes everything crucial across the full application — strategy, essays, activities, recommendations, and interview preparation. For most students, this is the sweet spot. If you want everything you actually need to submit strong, competitive applications, Gold is it.

Platinum includes all of the above, plus additional layers like blind application reviews, admissions committee simulations, premium interview prep, and other advanced tools. None of these are strictly necessary — you can get excellent results without them — but for families who want maximum coverage, more perspectives, or have specialized needs, they can be genuinely valuable.

Think of it like choosing between trim levels of the same car. The engine is identical. The safety is identical. Gold gets you where you want to go with everything that matters. Platinum adds comfort, optional features, and extra margin — worthwhile if those things matter to you, unnecessary if they don’t. You can’t go wrong with Gold or Platinum; the right choice depends on how much support you want, not on the quality of the work.

On the consultation call, we’ll tell you plainly which tier makes sense. If you don’t need the higher one, we’ll say so.

In general, no. Our pricing reflects the way we staff and deliver the work, and we don’t routinely restructure packages or spread payments out as a default.

That said, if there’s a real logistical constraint or timing issue, we’re always open to a straightforward conversation about whether there’s a way we can make things work. Talk to us.

We offer an initial grace period at the start of an engagement. During that window, you can change your service level — add scope, reduce scope, or cancel — for any reason. We do this so you can commit with clarity, not pressure. If something doesn’t feel right once the process begins, it’s better to correct course early than to force a bad fit to continue.

After the grace period ends, we do not offer refunds. At that point, your consultant and essay specialist have committed real, finite capacity to your work. We’re a boutique firm by design, and we don’t overbook or overload our consultants — when we say yes to a client, it necessarily means saying no to someone else. That’s how we protect quality, and it’s also why the policy needs to be firm once the engagement is underway.

We’re upfront about this so there are no surprises and no fine-print games. Read the policy, ask questions, and make sure the fit is right before you sign — that’s exactly what the consultation call is for. Once we start, we’re all in — so make sure you are too.

At the highest level, this work doesn’t get more “elite” than taking a genuinely complex student — imperfect stats, a personality that isn’t easy to coach, real narrative risk — and helping them compete credibly for the most selective universities in the world. That is the hardest version of this job. And it’s one we do as well as anyone, full stop. If a student has real Harvard-level potential in them, our job is to surface it, shape it, and make sure the admissions committee actually sees it. That’s the work. We don’t know how to do it halfway, and we don’t know how to do it better by charging ten times as much.

So why do some firms cost dramatically more? In some cases, you’re paying for scale inefficiencies. In others, for layers of branding, legacy prestige, or the comfort of an ultra-high price tag itself. There are categories of luxury where cost becomes part of the perceived value — where spending more feels like doing more, regardless of whether the underlying service meaningfully changes.

If that’s what you’re optimizing for, you should absolutely choose accordingly. But if what you care about is the quality of thinking, the sharpness of strategy, and whether the work actually holds up against the strongest applicants in the pool, price alone won’t tell you that story. Put us up against anyone in the arena. We’re comfortable with that comparison.

If you’re looking for the most expensive option, we may not be your firm. If you’re looking for the best work, we’ll see you in the winner’s circle.

You might not need to. If your situation is straightforward — strong profile, clear story, a limited school list — a lighter-touch option may be perfectly adequate, and we’d rather you save the money than pay for firepower you don’t actually need. We’re happy to say that plainly, and in some cases we can even point you toward other options within our broader network that may be a better fit.

Where the price difference starts to matter is in the caliber of judgment you’re buying. High-stakes admissions work is ultimately about the quality of the person diagnosing the situation and steering the strategy. The consultants who can do that consistently — especially with complex profiles or competitive targets — command real market value. You can find less expensive alternatives, but at some point the math forces a question: what’s being compromised? Experience, attention, selectivity, or depth of thinking.

Think of it the way you’d think about buying a diamond. There’s a range where the price differences are about preference. And then there’s a price below which you start wondering what you’re actually getting. If your application is low-risk, that uncertainty may be acceptable. If it isn’t, it usually isn’t.

The real question isn’t whether Admissionado is cheaper or more expensive than someone else. It’s whether the level of expertise you’re buying matches the stakes of your situation. If it does, we’re a strong fit. If it doesn’t, we’ll tell you that too.

Yes — and there’s a reason not every firm does. Hourly and a la carte work can be genuinely useful in the right situations, and genuinely frustrating in the wrong ones.

These options are best for students who already have a coherent strategy and need a targeted second set of eyes: pressure-testing an essay, sanity-checking a school list, or preparing for an interview. In those cases, a focused engagement can deliver exactly what’s needed without forcing anyone into a larger package that doesn’t make sense.

What hourly work is not designed to do is replace comprehensive consulting. If what you actually need is someone diagnosing the full picture, shaping the narrative, and quarterbacking the process over time, a one-off session won’t deliver that — and pretending otherwise helps no one. We’re careful about this distinction precisely because we want expectations to stay aligned with reality.

We offer flexibility because some families truly need only a narrow slice of help. Our job on the consultation call is to be honest about whether that’s you. If it is, we’re happy to meet you there. If it isn’t, we’ll tell you that too — before you spend money on the wrong solution.

There’s no formal enrollment deadline, but there are real constraints that matter. Consultant availability is finite. Our strongest consultants fill their rosters months before application season, and once they’re full, we don’t overload them — because overloaded consultants do worse work, and we’d rather turn away revenue than dilute quality.

The ideal timing depends on where your student is in the process. For families starting in freshman, sophomore, or junior year, engaging early preserves the full range of strategic options: profile development, extracurricular planning, testing timelines, and thoughtful school list architecture. For rising seniors, spring or early summer is the sweet spot. By late summer, we can still add value — but the runway is shorter, and options are narrower, simply because deadlines are closer.

The consultation call costs nothing and commits you to nothing. If you’re even considering working with a consultant, having the conversation sooner expands your choices. Waiting rarely does.

Usually, no. Our packages are priced to cover the full scope of work most students need, and we do that deliberately because we hate nickel-and-diming. We don’t want clients paying extra for things that are reasonably predictable parts of the process, and we don’t want anyone subsidizing services they’ll never use.

There are two exceptions worth calling out. The first is rush work. When timelines compress at the last minute, delivering the same quality requires outsized effort and reallocation of consultant capacity. We do offer rush support when needed, but it comes at an additional cost — not as a penalty, but because it genuinely takes more to execute well. Our goal is always to help clients avoid this scenario through early planning, not to profit from it.

The second is highly specialized situations that fall outside the norm — things like Oxbridge-specific interview preparation or other uncommon requirements that don’t apply to most applicants. It wouldn’t be fair to bake those costs into standard pricing, so in rare cases, they’re handled separately.

The principle is simple: we price our services so that most clients never see an extra charge, and when something truly falls outside the expected scope, we talk about it clearly and in advance. You’ll never be surprised by an invoice you didn’t understand or agree to.